- Relevant context and
applicability is the best way to spur student engagement.
- Instructor presence is
helpful (sometimes necessary), but a "light touch" rather than
heavy interaction actually helps encourage dialogue.
- Clearly defined expectations
(typically either in the discussion prompt or the syllabus) about both
what's required of students and what to expect from the instructor is
helpful.
- Discussions don't necessarily
have to be graded, but a clear understanding of their value and
contribution to the course (and to the grade if relevant) is
essential. Too meticulous of grading or rubric can discourage
anything more than minimal participation.
- Rubrics and stated guidelines
for amount and quantity of participation can be helpful, but there's a
risk of superficiality (posting for the grade, rather than the natural
learning value) which can be detrimental to good discussion.
- Having designated student
moderators can give them ownership and encourage quality discussion.
- For larger classes, groups
and moderation is essential.
What are your thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment